Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 11:36 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
        Looks like it went in without that; but let me give another one - looks
risk-free to me :-)

The rationale was that Noel had already approved the same patch for
the 3-6 branch, so I *was* the third.

        Fair enough ;-) but nothing like extra scrutiny to improve things. It's
also a good plan to manually add the complete Reviewed-by: (or
signed-off-by) headers to the commit msg so the guilty can be traced
later [ but perhaps gerrit makes that harder ? ]

        Thanks !

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.