On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 11:36 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Looks like it went in without that; but let me give another one - looks
risk-free to me :-)
The rationale was that Noel had already approved the same patch for
the 3-6 branch, so I *was* the third.
Fair enough ;-) but nothing like extra scrutiny to improve things. It's
also a good plan to manually add the complete Reviewed-by: (or
signed-off-by) headers to the commit msg so the guilty can be traced
later [ but perhaps gerrit makes that harder ? ]
Thanks !
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.