Re: modules removal surprises

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>
Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:01:19 +0100

On 11/08/2012 08:46 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:

stlport is only necessary for compatibility of existing extensions that
may be linked against it; it is no longer used by LO code.

So is a welcome candidate for orderly removal. Like announcing itsplanned removal with LO 4.0 and actually removing it with 4.1. (It canalready be considered deprecated for quite a while, so I would not mindremoving it already in 4.0, either, if need be. For authors of oldextensions, all that should be necessary is to rebuild them with arecent SDK.)

If there are no objections, I'll take care of the 4.0-announcment,4.1-removal plan.


Stephan

Context

modules removal surprises · Matúš Kukan
- Re: modules removal surprises · Michael Stahl
  - Re: modules removal surprises · Stephan Bergmann
    - Re: modules removal surprises · Michael Meeks
      - Re: modules removal surprises · Stephan Bergmann
- Re: modules removal surprises · Andras Timar
  - Re: modules removal surprises · Sophie Gautier
  - Re: modules removal surprises · Michael Meeks
    - Re: modules removal surprises · David Tardon
  - Re: modules removal surprises · Cedric Bosdonnat

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.