Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Patch_Handling_Guidelines#Be_patient_while_waiting_for_review

Reading the wiki page on submitting patches, it says that after
submitting patches, we should be patient.

"Be patient while waiting for review.
While many core developers are paid to work on this project full-time
or nearly so, our increasing number of committers and patch reviewers
do this in their precious spare time. So, please be patient when your
patch does not get reviewed right away."

I am wondering if you have been submitting patches for a long time
could give an average timeline of how long it usually takes for a
patch to be reviewed, and how long it is good to be patient for before
wondering if something went wrong or your patch was missed, e.g. 1
week, 1 month, 3 months, ...

Part of being patient is having reasonable expectations.

Jeremy

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.