Hi,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 06:23:01PM -0700, V Stuart Foote wrote:
David,
Nominated the fdo#53474 as a most annoying for 3.6. It is a regression from
3.5 and has been with us now for four build/QA reviews.
Not sure of the etiquette but are you willing to take assignment of the bug?
Provisionally, on the condition that the patch really fixes the problem
:-) I am going to step back immediately if it does not, because I do not
have Windows, so I have no means to debug it.
The Java Accessibility testers (JavaMonkey and JavaFerret) are pretty
simplistic, but appear on a par to the Accerciser test tool for Gnome ATK
AT-SPI--not sure why they would not have be invoked in QA process.
Unfortunately, with both the MSVC and MinGW Tinderbox builds of Master not
currently producing usable builds no way to test your patch. Any chance of
getting a nod from fellow devs to push down to a 3.6 build and come at it
that way?
I guess that would not be a problem (except to actually round someone to
review the patch, because nearly everyone is at the conference).
D.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.