Re: [PATCH] sal_bool and String conversions

On 10/02/2012 04:22 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Part of my motivation for adding this, besides making String->OUString
> conversion easier, was that OUString already has the operator+= methods.

Yes, but OUStringBuffer only has append() until now, and---as Michael 
already pointed out---some append() overloads take multiple parameters, 
so cannot map naturally to operator+=.  So I see more value in keeping 
the append() vs. operator+= difference between OUStringBuffer and 
OUString, than in removing that difference but instead introducing 
differences between what OUStringBuffer::append() supports vs. what any 
new OUStringBuffer::operator+= would support.

Stephan