Re: using bool in rtl::OUStringBuffer::append

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:04:35 +0200

On 09/23/2012 10:49 PM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:

after I got tinderbox mail complaining about ambiguous overload for
rtl::OUStringBuffer::append(bool) I wanted to ask if we could add a
rtl::OUStringBuffer::append(bool) method or if there are reasons
against it. From what I can see it could in the end even share the
implementation with the sal_Bool variant just needs an own method in
rtl::OUStringBuffer.

I see no reason against adding such an overload. (I would assumeappending the string representation of a boolean is a feature rarelyused, so this demand did not arise earlier.)


Stephan

Context

using bool in rtl::OUStringBuffer::append · Markus Mohrhard
- Re: using bool in rtl::OUStringBuffer::append · Stephan Bergmann
- Re: using bool in rtl::OUStringBuffer::append · Michael Stahl
  - Re: using bool in rtl::OUStringBuffer::append · Markus Mohrhard
    - Re: using bool in rtl::OUStringBuffer::append · Stephan Bergmann
      - Re: using bool in rtl::OUStringBuffer::append · Noel Grandin
        
        Re: using bool in rtl::OUStringBuffer::append · Stephan Bergmann
        
        Re: using bool in rtl::OUStringBuffer::append · Lubos Lunak

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.