On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:24:09PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* Present:
+ propose new Difficulty: DifficultyHard
Eek, multiple questions on that:
- What would be the difference to "DifficultyInteresting" in hard and objective
terms?
- How do we make sure we would all judge the EasyHack the same way as either
"DifficultyBeginner", "DifficultyInteresting" and "DifficultyHard"?
If we cant sufficiently safely make the second answer a "yes" without
generating a huge wikipage describing the process of judging an EasyHack in an
objective manner, the finegrained classification is worthless as it will be
inconsistent. If we need a huge wikipage, a/ we have already lost b/ we have
hours of bikeshedding on that in front of us.
AI: + add/adapt the wiki page / generation scripts (Bjoern)
Rejecting, and invoking "you touch it, you own it" on Michael. ;)
Best,
Bjoern
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.