On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 11:00 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Wednesday 19 of September 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
So there is no automatic way to verify that an include set is
'minimal', but there isn't even a way to do that with eyeballing...
Actually, there possibly is an automatic way to do that:
http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/ . I haven't tried it though.
I -believe- this was tried - someone in bugzilla had an easy hack to
look at it, and it produced pretty awful / unusable results IIRC: mostly
adding dozens of new includes.
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.