Hi Flo, all,
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 07:53:35PM +0300, Florian Reisinger wrote:
In fact, it was a good choice... (I hope you can read this table...)
While the statistic alone do not really prove this to be good move, but there
was a consensus on the qa call(*) and the qa list that this needs to be done to
allow the QA team to keep moving and not getting bogged down in thousends of
incomplete or controversal bug reports.
Now, of course, such a bulk move will always hit some false positives. If that
is the case for one of the bugs you reported (that is: the bug is
welldocumented, complete and noncontroversial) please check:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugTriage
if the bug indeed contains all the information needed and thus send it back to
REOPENED.
Thanks!
Best,
Bjoern
(*)
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/minutes-of-the-LibreOffice-QA-Call-2012-06-29-1400UTC-td3992888.html
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.