On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 02:25 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> wrote:
... and suggested action: writing a dozen fixes for LO. There is no
shortage of wisdom around here how to do things well in theory, I think.
Sorry for sounding rude...
Nah, that did not sound rude at all... especially compared to what I
had in mind :-)
It's certainly an FAQ :-) We have end-users that have no idea what is
involved in our development process, and how we work to eliminate bugs,
and the innovations we've introduced to try to reduce regressions, and
so on.
And of course we're not there yet; in particularly I keep meaning to
file my performance regression testing easy-hack to get something setup
there.
In my ideal world we have someone who wants to write a blog series on
our approach to improving quality - that we can feed with some
outlines / tid-bits & they can research and write-up the good story of
where we're at today.
Its easy to see the improvements from the inside, but perhaps not so
much from the outside :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: minutes of ESC call ... (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.