Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:07 PM, John Smith <lbalbalba@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Noel Grandin <noel@peralex.com> wrote:

On 2012-07-30 11:50, John Smith wrote:

Maybe. But even so, bugs in 3rd party software that LibreOffice
depends on, potentially means problems in LibreOffice, right ?


Yeah, but it's a lot more painful working on that stuff because of the need
to push it upstream.
I personally, would prefer a report that focussed on the LO-specific code,
at least until we get the report down to a manageable size.

Well the analyzer simply 'follows' what you are compiling. So if there
is a way to configure LO (configure --without-foo --without-bar, or
something) to not make it compile all the 3rd party stuff, you
theoretically could generate a report on 'LO only', I guess.

PS: Would './configure --disable-extensions' be 'close enough' for
this purpose ?

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.