Re: [REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

Hi Eike,

On 2012-07-27 at 11:29 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:

> > I am not sure if this is intuitive, so it is slightly controversal as
> > well => we should not risk it for rc4.
>
> Hum? The fraction input did not change, that was always the case. An
> input of "23/42" never yielded a numeric value. The change enables
> abbreviated (only month and day, e.g. 27/7) date input for those locales
> again, where currently one has to enter a complete date, e.g. 27/7/2012

The question is - is this that serious that it cannot wait until 3.6.1?
If you can get enough approvals for 3.6.0 still, nobody will block it I
guess :-), but I for one would really like to limit the amount of things
that go to rc4 to bare minimum.

All the best,
Kendy