Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 15:36 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
I am really hesitant to support just having so many bugs floating
around like this. I think that marking as RESOLVED -> WONTFIX enables
devs to look at these if they are ever inclined to do so but makes it
clear to the users that we won't be doing this.

Yup, I agree totally. Its not helpful to have loads of no-hoper bugs
floating around. They should be closed with resolved->wontfix. My
suggestion is only around the comment and criteria to use when closing
them. e.g. here's our fedora-16 one
http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora16#Comment_Text_2

So taking the fedora comment and adjusting it for us, it would look
like...

"
LibreOffice ''(major-version}'' changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on
''(date here)''. LibreOffice ''(major-version}'' is no longer
maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or
bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
LibreOffice please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
"

so for us that would mean anything reported against 3.3.X and 3.4.X is
up for mass-closing with the above.

C.


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.