Re: Possible change to the "Native Build" page?

On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 07:49 +0800, Phil Hart wrote:
> On 20/06/2012 8:21 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 15:37 +0800, Phil Hart wrote:
> > > Answers:
> > >
> > > phil@linux-012k:~/Downloads/libreoffice-core-3.5.99.1> grep JAVA config_host.mk
> > > export JAVALIB=-L/usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj/lib64
> > > export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj
> > > export JAVA_SOURCE_VER=1.6
> > > export JAVA_TARGET_VER=1.6
> > odd, I wonder why it ended up as 1.6 here. I'd have expected 1.5. Can I
> > get the output of...
> >
> > java -version
> > and
> > javac -version
> > and
> > grep JDK config_host.mk
> >
> > I mean, gcj should work, and should work out of the box (though from the
> > above a hackaround of --with-java-target-version=1.5
> >
> > C.
> Answers:
...
> Question: Might these values have been affected by the install of Java-1_6_0-openjdk-devel
> that I did previously?

Yes, I wanted to see the java + javac output of the configuration that
the config_host.mk from the failed build was generated with :-) Rather
than their current post-openjdk install values.

C.