Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2012][svg export filter] Weekly Report #4

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:51:48 +0200, Thorsten Behrens
<thb@documentfoundation.org> wrote:

> Marco Cecchetti wrote:
> > >Slightly tangential - how about filing a few easy hacks for adding
> > >more shape and slide animations? It's mostly busy work, and a nice
> > >rewarding experience for new hackers - here's how:
> > >
> > >  http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks
> >
> > Ok, I appended it to my to do list.
> > Is there some animation you're especially interested in ?
> Nope - maybe best to have something of two meta-easy-hack bugs, that just
> links to
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sd/xml/effects.xml
>
> and
>
>  http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sd/xml/transitions.xml
>
> such that people can pick their favourite?

Yes, I think is the best solution, how should I categorize them ?
Is EasyHack,DifficultyBeginner,SkillJavaScript,SkillCpp ok ?
What about LibO version and importance settings ?

> > >With the pending changes, would you want to create a new
> > >features/svg-export2 branch & stick them in there for me & others to
> > >play?
> >
> > Just to be sure I got it correctly:
> > do you mean a new branch separated from the feature/svg-export
> > branch where I push my contributions weekly ?
> Yeah - since you merged feature/svg-export already, committing and
> merging that again (I think) gives a somewhat nasty non-linear git
> history - best practice it seems is to create a new branch from
> current master HEAD, and cherry-pick your outstanding
> feature/svg-export commits into that.

Well, I did that but I named the new branch derived from master
HEAD feature/svg-export again. Is that confusing ?

-- Marco


--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/