On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> wrote:
Definitely was bogus count before fix, and correct count afterwards.
Pushed to master now. Sorry for delay. I should cook up a regression
test for this.
Thanks for pushing the patch. I can add the regression test myself if
you give me a couple of pointers; e.g. where to add it, or the source
of a similar test. If you do add it yourself, please share the commit
so that I can learn to add tests for my changes in the future.
Regards,
--Muhammad
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.