On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:02:43AM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Do I see the beginning of some "CWS" process here?
BTW, the main trouble with the CWS process was that it required the changes to
completely resolve some random bug description (aka. what some non-developer
dreamed up to be his pet solution), plus the broken QA processes. That should
never be the criteria for inclusion of a commit. Nor should it be "would I do
it different?". The only question to ask would be: "Is is better than what we
have right now?".
Questions regarding the "bigger picture" should not be discussed on one
specific commit. They belong on the mailing list/ESC. If gerrit helps us detect
conflicting development early, that is a Good Thing(tm): Its better to align
efforts early rather that late (when two conflicting efforts are already half
done, and one has to be thrown away/redone).
Best,
Bjoern
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.