Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


In order to use the API would one of the webmasters have to add things to
the server? Looks much more promising than it did a few hours ago. Thanks
for pointing me in the right directino

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com> wrote:

Bugzilla has a REST API
  https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API
for which there are various client libraries

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Addons#Client_libraries_for_the_Bugzilla_Webservices.2FREST_API

which you might be able to use to automate this process.

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
Unfortunately it looks like automating this process will be near
impossible.
When you download CSV files from bugzilla it lacks most fields (no idea
why
they do this), thus making it necessary to do the individual searches
with
queries on specific fields. After this I would have to add fields to the
csv
file in LO or some other software, then merge the files. Ultimately I'm
debating if it's worth the time. I do like the idea in general and think
it
makes for a more functional search experience for developers but getting
this started as well as keeping it up to date might just be too time
consuming/not efficient.

Just to give an idea of how many files I would need to download just for
skill level, topic & skills needed would be 3(beginner, interesting,
unknown) * 5(UI,Cleanup,Debug,Web,QA) * 9 (CPP, Debug, Infra, Java,
JavaScript, Python, Script, Uno, Vcl) = 135

Furthermore, I can't figure out how to automate the downloads of the CSV
files which would make my work a lot easier. If anyone knows a method to
do
this please share.

This is now an unknown, 135 files to download, edit, merge, etc...I may
try
to file a bug against bugzilla to see if they will add the ability to
download CSV files with all data instead of a truncated version


Joel


On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com>
wrote:

Yeah I agreed with that after doing it. My initial thought was it would
give a developer an idea of how many people were involved and thus if
they
might want to join but it's hard to automate and not as functional as I
originally thought. I'm going to dig through bugzilla a bit more to see
the
options but glad that you find at least the idea useful.


Joel


On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Philipp Riemer <ruderphilipp@gmail.com>
wrote:

I love the option to have it sortable by different criteria! But
please make the Bugzilla-IDs (and the "description" text) links to the
bugtracker to provide an easy option to jump there at interest.

In addition,  also the field "topic" which indicates if it e.g. UI
related or for the webpage etc. would be good (see

<
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks_Bugzilla_Whiteboard_Status
)

To be honest, I have to admit that I do not understand the benefit of
the column showing the number of mailing lists.

--
Philipp

2012/6/1 Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com>:
I created a new page and looking for feedback before I complete it. I
wanted
every bug listed on one page sortable by end user. Furthermore,
wanted
to
include additional information so it would be a bit easier for
developers to
see information about the bug without having to actually click on it.
I'll
create a small script to auto pull from bugtracker and keep the list
up
to
date based on that.



https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Sortable_Hack_List_with_Details#Complete_List_of_Hacks




_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.