Hi Walt,
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 08:35 -0700, walt wrote:
On 05/26/2012 05:21 PM, walt wrote:
I was hoping that my patch (below) would fix my problem while honoring
the spirit of your code, but it turns out to have no effect at all,
either good or bad.
You bonehead! You got rows and columns mixed up. What an idiot.
:-) You're doing really well for a self-described:
Keep in mind that I'm not a c(++) programmer, so my error might be as
trivial as incorrect syntax. (I can't afford the hours it took me to
test the patch, just to experiment with syntax :)
Having said that, it makes it much easier to review & merge this sort
of thing with a [PATCH]: prefix in the Subject, and preferably a bug
reference so we can aggregate the context of the problem in one place
(that we can refer back to later). Meaning (incidentally) that I didn't
merge the change ;-)
Thanks !
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.