Hello Stephan, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> schrieb am 07.05.2012, 10:59 +0200:
On 05/06/2012 09:47 PM, Sebastian Humenda wrote:I hope I'm on the right list for my question. There is an accessibility checker for Libreoffice documents which I package for Debian GNU/Linux. In Bug 668376 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668376) the package fails to install because unopkg causes a mysterious error (see output at the bottom of bug the report). I've discussed it with the upstream developer of AccessODF, but he said there's no reason why an error should occure. So I have two questions: 1. Can I somehow optain even more error output then I get with "-v" during install? 2. Could it even be a unopkg/Libreoffice bug? The upstream developer and I can install the package with no problem, only the bug reporter had those errors. We tested the installation of corse in a clean chroot.Looking into AccessODF.oxt as included in <http://crustulus.de/accessodf_0.1-1_all.deb>, the actively registered accessodf-addon.jar uses classes from lib/accessodf.jar ("java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: be/docarch/accessodf/Constants"), but the manifest Class-Path of accessodf-addon.jar reads Class-Path: file:///usr/share/java/accessodf.jar instead of Class-Path: lib/accessodf.jar
Thanks for the hint, I'll investigate this. The file file:///usr/share/java/accessodf.jar is present when unopkg is called. There should be no reason that it cannot find this file during registration. Is it more common to have those dependencies in the Jar file or is externally also ok? Thanks Sebastian -- Blog (English | Deutsch): http://crustulus.de/blog Teste das freie Latein-Deutsch-Wörterbuch: http://freedict.org/dict?Form=dict3&Database=lat-deu Freedict: Free multilingual dictionary databases - http://www.freedict.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature