On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Jesús Corrius <jesus@softcatala.org> wrote:
could anyone of the Windows experts please give me some insight,
why you're using MSVC for LO, instead of gcc ?
Is there anything important that cannot be done w/ gcc ?
Short version:
The MSVC build is considered stable (has historically always been used
to compile OOo/LibO) while the gcc support is still experimental.
The are things that can't be compiled using gcc, mostly related to ATL
stuff used in the ActiveX control and shellextensions. Most of the
code (if not all) could be rewritten, but no one has shown real
interest in doing that yet.
and.. switching means ABI breakage with all extensions...
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.