Re: [PUSHED 3-5] idle-callbacks in writer don't end early, so your responsiveness sucks rocks

On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:58 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 12:27 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > maybe the proposed gtk3 one is sufficient for gtk3,
> > definitely the alternative impl *seems* ok for gtk2 is I enable it
> > locally experimentally.
>
>       Really ? I recall reading gdkevents, consulting the mainatiners and
> tearing my hair over this when I arrived at that solution - having
> decided not to pull and re-push all the events to avoid confusing
> some-part-or-other of gtk+ (but hopefully I was mistaken).

Well, unsure of it of course, but with just that bit toggled on for gtk2
nothing seemed obviously different on a casual walk-through. With or
without for gtk3 seems to equally odd results for redraws and so forth,
so hard to tell if I've broken that, quite possibly.

>       We should prolly remove all the slow & heavy-lifting addEvent /
> subtractEvent / resetEvents code if we do it this way though - there is
> no need for that anymore.

Yeah.

C.