Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 11/04/12 12:10, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I.e. does he want to develop a (64-bit) Java "extension" that would be
run in a JVM instantiated in the (32-bit, on Windows) LO process, or
use UNO to invoke interfaces in LO from a (64-bit) Java process?

I thought that in the latter case the normal thing was that the Java
code and LO are in separate processes? So in theory that the Java
process is 64-bit and the LO one 32-bit should not matter? I might of
course be quite confused, though.

IIRC in URE there is a "jpipe" library that is loaded into the JVM
process via JNI, and that has to match the ABI of the JVM of course.

That said, the work required to make LO work as 64-bit code for
Windows is not necessarily that huge. It's just a question of somebody
having the time and inspiration to work on it. It's definitely not
trivial either, though.

yes, so i guess this work would need to be finished in order to use
x86_64 JVM on Windows.


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.