Re: [PATCH] EasyHack, fdo#46808, Adapt UNO services to new style, Parts 2 through 5

On 28/03/12 12:11, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> * CTORS accessible.AccessBridge:  This service being of interface type 
> XInitialization looks strange.  (XInitialization is more of an internal 
> interface, so that instances of such a service can obtain arguments when 
> being constructed.  Explicit constructors of new-style services 
> internally call it.)

i wonder, this XInitialization always seemed to be like some backward
compatibility kludge, would it be possible to get rid of this for LO4
and pass the arguments to the C++ ctor of the implementing class
directly or at least a static factory method or something like that, or
is there some reason why that wouldn't work?

> * MODULE:  These services are not intended to be instantiated at the 
> global component context/service manager, but rather via 
> document-specific factories.  (Some that I labelled MODULE might 
> actually be MARKER -- I did not look too close.)

but it would actually be possible use a hypothetical document-specific
component context to construct these.  which currently does not exist
for any application, so maybe it doesn't make sense to expose such
constructors just yet :)