Hi Enrico,
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 19:04 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Most of the patches are ancient, against ancient versions, completely
outdated. Many of them are only quick and dirty hacks for the bundled
building
:-) if you have fixes / improvements they are most welcome. Clearly
waiting for an up-stream release (eg. gnumake - at over 12 months since
the last release), is not always an option - at which point, you have to
patch the pristine source tar-ball; checkout the patch count on most
working linux distributions :-)
Just a sidenote: in one of my recent projects, i've been working on
for about a year, we had exactly the same problem. It's a software for
medical data aquisition computers und Linux embedded devices.
Sounds like they fell into the embedded linux trap, and needed to
standardise on a better setup shared with others, pocky / Yocto or
something. I agree with your analysis here.
PS: please forgive me, if I'm a bit too emotional, but I really hate
seeing resources burned on nonsense.
So - perhaps I just don't understand the alternative well enough; lets
assume we find a build bug in openssl on some minority platform - say
AIX, what does your perfect-world flow look like :-)
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.