Re: [REVIEWED] fdo#46102 script dispatch java extensions are broken

Rubber-stamp: booom!!!

I will cherry-pick now

Cheers

Fridrich

On 27/03/12 11:08, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Michael Stahl píše v Pá 23. 03. 2012 v 20:50 +0100:
> > On 23/03/12 16:58, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > > To fix <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46102> "script 
> > > dispatch java extensions are broken" requires
> > >
> > > * 
> > > <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=91d60be7eeafa1f7872bda452bfb38936003f517>
> > > "fdo#46102: Fix scripting jar manifests after gbuild'ification"
> > >
> > > * and 
> > > <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=dd6c4f4db1d62268d73e09ae52d23f760a967dcc>
> > >  
> > > "fdo#46102: Load Java scripts with class loaders that actually find them"
> > >
> > > * and optionally also 
> > > <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0b9fda25f321ce2697179064e330843237177668>
> > >  
> > > "fdo#46102: Fix Java script examples after gbuild'ification" so that the 
> > > three example Java scripts bundled with LO work again.
> > >
> > > Please consider for inclusion in libreoffice-3-5 and, at reviewer's 
> > > discretion, libreoffice-3-5-2.
> >
> > perhaps some of these java gbuild things are a bit suboptimal, i never
> > liked that package root thing, but whatever...
> >
> > pushed to libreoffice-3-5
>
> To be honest, I do not understand everything. Though, it looks sensible.
> It fixes the problem. Java extensions, javascript, and javabeans
> examples still work. So, it looks fine to me.
>
> We need one more approval for 3-5-2.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
>
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice