Re: Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:52:29 +0200

On 03/26/2012 05:06 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:

On 03/26/2012 12:21 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:

The following patch seems to help, does it look sane?


Tor, I see you pushed this now, although it is wrong (or at least does
not address the root of the problem, which is that
JNI_compound_type_info makes css.uno.RuntimeException's m_base
erroneously point to css.uno.Exception instead of null.

I'm working on a proper fix, but gbuild'ification of jvmfwk breaking the
old testtools/source/bridgetest tests makes this take a little longer...


Pushed proper fix now; reverted previous one.

Stephan

Context

Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik · Tor Lillqvist
- Re: Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik · Noel Grandin
- Re: Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik · Tor Lillqvist
  - Re: Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik · Tor Lillqvist
    - Re: Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik · Stephan Bergmann
      - Re: Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik · Tor Lillqvist
        
        Re: Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik · Stephan Bergmann
        
        Re: Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik · Stephan Bergmann
        
        Re: Any JNI/UNO bridge experts around? Some assumptions about field ids are apparently not valid for Dalvik · Tor Lillqvist

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.