Hi Tor,
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 10:57 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Any idea whether this really is needed, or can it easily be replaced
by some of our other string classes? Or is hwpfilter so utterly
unimportant code that it's not worth pondering?
It can be replaced, it's an internal implementation detail of hwpfilter
as/when bugzilla comes back, it'd be great to create an easy hack to
replace that - prolly with an rtl::OUStringBuffer or somesuch.
We might need to add some more helper functions on the stringbuffer
while we're there (from oustring) - the find/compare stuff eg.
Any chance you could file that as as easy hack ? just put: "EasyHack:
foo" in the subject, and:
"EasyHack,DifficultyBeginner,SkillCpp,TopicCleanup"
in the whiteboard, and you're done :-)
Thanks !
Micahel.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.