julien2412 wrote:
Now if I well understood what you said, this function needs more work. So I suppose I don't need to ask if it could be useful to push this fix on 3.5
Nope. Code there appears to be completely unused, at least I did not manage to trigger it with any encryption / signature-related functionality. Cheers, -- Thorsten
Attachment:
pgpygZl__sV94.pgp
Description: PGP signature