On 01/27/2012 02:27 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
Heh, I am getting really scared by the flood of patches waiting for
3-5-0 approval. Some are not trivial and it is getting dangerous.
Yes.
But if you think / feel that actually one additional would be enough, I
guess we can talk about that at one of the next TSC's?
Sure, we could discuss this. I think that we do not need 3 reviews for
translation update, dictionaries update and similar things that are
usually safe and can't be reasonably checked by developers.
No need to discuss from my end. I was just confused what the exact
rules are, as I noticed some changes ("illegally," as it now turns out
:) going in with only two overall reviews while other reviewers
(correctly) requested two more acks. The more the better, anyway.
Stephan
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.