On 24/01/12 16:12, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 23/01/12 21:31, Lubos Lunak wrote:
It seems to be quite a common way for LO code to use this
let's-push-all-the-data-as-properties-one-by-one approach, so I wonder
what the common way of avoiding this problem is? Preferably something
that's not an ugly hack, excuse the naivety.
i'm not aware of a general solution for this problem; i'm afraid if
there are good reasons not do a change as above, then ugly hack is in
order... i don't remember running into such a problem before, probably
this kind of dependency is quite rare.
I've eventually settled on db0f839920c38973f8448df0f74de7c4c95c832c , could
somebody review and push to 3.5?
that shouldn't break anything, pushed:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=17ccd3cfc9dd86e2911a0a31f6dcbba8d7e7950a
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.