On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 12:12 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
WRT to this patch, there are two files; the binary file opens____.ttf
and the text file OpenSymbol.sfd.
Right - the original / authoritative version should be the .sdf file
which (IIRC) as well as being 'diff -u' able - so we can see what
changed, is/was also more descriptive & complete :-)
I used fontforge tool under ubuntu to draw the new characters.
Great - that's the right approach.
The sfd file is generated based on the ttf binaries.
So - IMHO it should be the other way around ;-) at least, when I last
edited that font; if we've fluffed that up I suggest we load the
original sfd, copy in the new glyphs from the TTF, save it as sfd, and
re-export as ttf ;-)
Of course - it'd be nice to do that compilation to TTF during the
build, but ... it's not so easy without fontforge installed.
HTH,
Michael.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.