Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:38:45PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I'm not sure if Debian configures LO with --with-openldap for a

Because we didn't want to link with Mozilas libldap509.so (which evben
isn't properly SONAMEd) and have a dependency on Mozilla for that.

And that OpenLDAP is LDAP reference. Why use Mozilla if we have that?

specific reason or if we would be OK with switching to Mozilla LDAP in
future versions.

If you mean the standalone mozladap: if someone (Mozilla team? I
won't) packages it and it has a proper library etc, yes, we could switch
to that though I still don't see why OpenLDAP is bad.

Do we have positive confirmation that the LDAP features of LO work
with OpenLDAP?

AFAIR someone tested it with OpenLDAP when I wrote the patch for adding
--with-openldap back then. Might also be wrong remembering, though, never
tried it myself.

Just in case you missed this thread on upstream ML, wanted to give you
a heads-up so that you can weigh in before it maybe happens.

I noticed, but I managed to ignore so far because I don't even see the
sense in there.

Regards,

Rene

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.