Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Jonnathan, *,

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
<eagles051387@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/17/12 12:30 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Pedro<pedlino@gmail.com>  wrote:

So the problem here is that the connections dont get closed?

Yes, this has been written from the very beginning. And this problem
has been fixed in the code already. New releases (i.e. the first that
is offically released for end-users) will behave properly.

If that is the
case would'nt that be an easy fix in the sense that after a certain amount
of time that the connection is idle the connection gets closed? Is it
possible to do something like that with KeepAlive?

This is done. But the order of magnitude for keeping connections open
is seconds, whereas handling the actual request is a matter of
milliseconds.
Also I wrote previously that the keepalive timeout was already
adjusted to nullify the impact that the beta-users did have.

So all is fine. LO will behave properly, and the server will not
collapse because of that. Even if it was not fixed in LO, the server
could have been configured to ignore any keepalive requests.

But as I wrote all that already: time to move over to other stuff,
this topic is solved in my opinion already.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.