Hi James,
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 23:20 +1300, James C wrote:
I am currently building libreoffice-3-5, and will have some
investigation to do, after it stops.
Great :-)
Michael, yes, changing branches required much less bandwidth than
initially downloading.
Good.
In order to get something sensible, I had to
learn about --track, because the default on my version of GIT
(1.7.7.3, downloaded pre-built from Google Code) seems to be
non-tracking and detached HEADs.
I've never used --track - but if you say so :-)
What's the normal delay, for a patch to get from master to
libreoffice-3-5? I'm asking because having a delay is sensible, to
wait for obscure trouble, and mine has not made it yet.
Oh ! if you want your patch back-ported to -3-5 you need to post it on
the list here with a "[REVIEW-3-5] description of patch" Subject - and
someone will check & cherry-pick it for you. There is nothing automatic
about that, and of course we're only accepting bug-fixes in -3-5 as of
now (past the feature freeze).
None of this is urgent. I'll come back to you-all when I have some
results from my build.
Great - hopefully you'll get a build this time :-)
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.