Hi Michael,
Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> writes:
you are much more likely to get a reply for this kind of bug on the
dev list.
sorry I haven't got the feel for the right places yet;-)
sounds like a bug to me. guess you should file it in bugzilla and set
the "regression" keyword.
ok, I'll do that when I'm confident it's a regression.
in sc you should find some new C++ unit tests and old Java unit tests
(in qa/complex).
Thank you for the pointer.
i guess 3.4.4 is this: libreoffice-3.4.4.2
beta0: libreoffice-3.5.0.0
beta1: libreoffice-3.4.99.1
yes, really :)
Is that somewhere documented? Or wouldn't it be better if it was
obvious from the tag names?
Thank you,
Tomas
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.