Hi,
I was hacking on VersionInfo resource of Windows executables and I
noticed that DLLs built with dmake always have this resource, they
include solenv/inc/shlinfo.rc. But DLLs built with gmake does not have
VersionInfo resource by default. Is this normal? Executables are fully
functional without VersionInfo resource, but I think it is useful to
have it, because it contains file version, copyright notice etc. I
would like to ask, if it is by design, or if it is an undesired
omission.
Before I pushed my patch (3fbedc3e8f65c91999dcee42daa8312e387dcf40) I
build from scratch with MSVC successfully. However, I learned a few
hours later that I broke MinGW build.
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&brief-log=1323606001.25653#21811
I found it strange, because 1) I didn't see any problems at line 38 in
shlinfo.rc; 2) under MSVC no resource was built for ucbhelper. I think
this is related to the general question I asked above.
Could you please check this. Eventually I wanted to cherry-pick
3fbedc3e8f65c91999dcee42daa8312e387dcf40 to libreoffice-3-5, because
it improves VersionInfo a lot (especially regarding branding and file
version data).
Thanks,
Andras
Context
- [Libreoffice] Question about VersionInfo resource of Windows executables · Andras Timar
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.