Re: [Libreoffice] final and override

On 11/28/2011 01:27 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>         Sure - which is why we'd do that for old compiler versions only

...where it would still result in undefined behaviour, technically (note 
the "nitpick," was meant somewhat tongue-in-cheek).

>         final    bool methodFoo();
>         virtual  char methodBaz();
>         override int  methodBaa();

(Note that final and override go at the end of the declaration.)

Stephan