Hello all,
I've been curious why the Linux-x86-64_8-SLED11 tinderbox fails?
Correctly, sometimes it built successfully, but sometimes not.
And when it doesn't build, it seems to fail at these lines constantly:
/local/home/tinderbox/master/sfx2/sdi/sfxitems.sdi --- error: ( 86, 11 )
may be <no value for identifier <> > at ( 86, 11 )
/local/home/tinderbox/master/sfx2/sdi/sfxitems.sdi --- error: ( 86, 11 )
may be <unknown type> at ( 86, 11 )
/local/home/tinderbox/master/sfx2/sdi/sfxslots.sdi --- error: ( 38, 5 )
svidl terminated with errors
But as I look in sfx2/sdi/sfxitems.sdi, there is no ( 86, 11 ) at all.
Git grep and opengrok also return no result.
At first, I think it's related to binfilter enabled, but the "Linux
x86 Release Configuration" box is also binfilter-enabled and it build
well.
Best Regards,
--
Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Context
- [Libreoffice] SLED11 Tinderbox fails? · Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.