Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 11:32 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 24/11/11 21:35, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:58 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 23:19 +0900, Daisuke Nishino wrote:
I'm not sure if this is related to the problem, but I found an obvious
mistake.
I hope this patch fixes it.
I'm sorry for inconvenience.

aha, excellent. That clear's the most obvious one anyway. Will see if it
fixes everything, or if the remaining glitch I see is preexisting.

Indeed, all looks good now. "make subsequentcheck" just fails now I
believe because we have some conversions to "assert" from DBG_ASSERT or
OSL_ENSURE in
SwIndex::operator< so
 -o sw.SwXTextEmbeddedObject
 -o sw.SwXTextEmbeddedObjects
fail, which is unrelated to the table stuff.

sadly i cannot reproduce this here...
(am on revision 48d9feabd967f28bff8e73475f700f2ab009c4bc)

Hmm, easy peasy here. Some sort of CntntAnchor at a 0ed SwPosition or
something of that nature. Will try and get a bt and/or find where the
Anchor position gets created.

C.


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.