On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:58 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 23:19 +0900, Daisuke Nishino wrote:
I'm not sure if this is related to the problem, but I found an obvious
mistake.
I hope this patch fixes it.
I'm sorry for inconvenience.
aha, excellent. That clear's the most obvious one anyway. Will see if it
fixes everything, or if the remaining glitch I see is preexisting.
Indeed, all looks good now. "make subsequentcheck" just fails now I
believe because we have some conversions to "assert" from DBG_ASSERT or
OSL_ENSURE in
SwIndex::operator< so
-o sw.SwXTextEmbeddedObject
-o sw.SwXTextEmbeddedObjects
fail, which is unrelated to the table stuff.