On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:50:52AM +0000,
Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:15 -0500,
Marc-André Laverdière wrote:
>> I am convincing some powers-that-be
that having a build farm would
>> be good, and they are starting to
listen. This would really help me
>> write patches for LO, as my poor
computer is having impossibly long
>> compile cycles.
>> There is a bunch of somewhat old
Linux workstations that could
>> contribute to it. The concern is
mostly that it should be so that the
>> systems should not accept jobs when
users are logged in, as it may
>> interfere with whatever work it is
that they are doing.
Maybe more interesting than "nobody logged on"
would be "system load
very low", e.g. "load <= 0.1*(number of
cores)", possibly combined
with "free memory + memory used for cache
>= threshold".
> I'm sure they'd accept a patch to
add a config option to use some
> system heuristic before accepting a
job. Of course, reliably detecting a
> login session is prolly quite fun in
itself ;-) ps ax | grep
> gnome-session | kdeinit or something ?
Nah:
#include <utmpx.h>
struct utmpx *getutxent(void);
struct utmpx *getutxid(const struct
utmpx *);
struct utmpx *getutxline(const struct
utmpx *);
struct utmpx *pututxline(const struct
utmpx *);
void setutxent(void);
void endutxent(void);
is the POSIX/SUS interface to do that. Or just
run "/usr/bin/who -q"
:)
--
Lionel