Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Considering actual multi-user site scenarios, I think it is fairly
useless to have the name of the machine in the lock file. Consider
these examples:

1) Alice wants to edit a document. Computer says "No". Er, sorry, been
watching too much Little Britain.

I mean, LO says "document is locked by Bob on
lab-pc-34-f7-a1.campus.city.example.com" . Now what? Alice probably
doesn't know which of the dozens of PCs in some lab is the one whose
official name is lab-pc-34-f7-a1 . And it might even be a dynamically
assigned name that could  indicate *any* of them. So she just calls
Bob who says "ok, I'll close it".

And even if she would know which machine it actually is, and that
would be within walking distance, that gets us to :

2) LO says "document is locked by Bob on rubber-duck.exmple.com".
Alice knows that rubber-duck is Bob's personal desktop (she doesn't
want to know why it is called that), and phones Bob. No reply. Alice
walks over to his cubicle, sees he is gone for a long lunch (it's
Friday), with machine locked. How useful to know that the document is
open on that machine... no?

In both cases, just knowing *who* is holding the document open would be enough.

--tml

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.