On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 15:41 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Kohei,
On Thursday, 2011-11-10 12:49:29 -0800, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
commit eaea417bfdf8d06df2b7f2e42c904c32ce77e871
Author: Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yoshida@suse.com>
Date: Thu Nov 10 15:45:53 2011 -0500
Removing the mixed comparison flag, which is no longer needed.
This flag was introduced years ago to deal with Excel's behavior on
incorrectly sorted data range. But later versions of Excel no longer
follow that behavior & keeping this flag would make the evaluation
code unnecessarily more complex & hard to adopt to multi-item matching.
Isn't that needed for MATCH and ([HV])LOOKUP with mixed data such as
1,2,3,b,c,d when queried for "a" would return the last less_or_equal
position, hence 3? Or are we now on a good track where when querying for
string we always return #N/A if the less_or_equal match is numeric (and
vice versa)?
Thanks. Reverted. Will try to come up with a different approach then.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.