Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 15:47 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 11/01/2011 07:50 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Wouldn't they benefit/suffer from the stable ABI requirement then,
whereas in comphelper they don't? Or am I mislead?

Yup, that was the original rationale for introducing 
comphelper/string.hxx, see the comment at the start of the file.

        The benefits of the stable ABI requirement are somewhat unclear to me.
If (as seems ~certain) we are going to have a flag day at some stage,
there is no harm moving this little lot into the sal/ library. To what
degree these helpers randomly change over time is something that can
presumably be quite easily seen from the git log. To me they look rather
sensibly designed & stable from the header [ just hard to find ].

        So - I think this splitting code into lots of different places for ABI
reasons can be re-considered.

        HTH,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.