Re: [Libreoffice] Windows build tagging ...

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@suse.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 01:55 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> > So I suspect the --set-last-working shall be limited to the
> > tinderboxes that build regularly with a non-changing setup, i.e.
> > without having random other stuff that might affect the build-result?
>
>        Well - I suggest we do it manually for now; at least something is
> better than nothing here.
>
> > never used the notes feature - but its help says that it can list the
> > notes - so no parsing of the full log necessary, just using "git notes
> > list"
>
>        Sure, a good idea :-) I've been there; here is some sample output:
>
> $ git notes list | head
> 63128339eb1c9dceab08cb9f34c8b3a6b278f48b 002c16ce95fa6e384e7541b6e656b9058dd9b459
> 3d98f2ca6d9843f7eecf3f8c8d85da2b3eb9e209 00a326249f7bb4e7ded9c743836d9d572d3a9d7f
> de193bbe203f54b2cbb18d03962691b91a3b0b4c 00a6a3f6279dcf3b790a17f21bccd3e4cea1fc57
> 742a4d7cc15dda42a1acdab966994d39a9a0d991 010a4baa37bbdca0c35dc3555f6467174e956644
>
>        Not so helpful in my view ;-)


This is the notes list - show <first hash> and check for message, if
it is OK, checkout he <second hash>, but true:

> > or if one wants to parse a log, one can do it with
> >
> > git log -p `git notes get-ref`
> > that way one only has to examine the ones that match. or can do a
>
>        Sure - but the problem is then that you need to sort them into a
> sequential /chronological order (which the notes list does not appear to
> be in).

Git log on the notes object is not the same as git notes list.
the log is sequential/chronological as is any other commit.

> At the end of the day - the 'git log' output is in the order we
> want, and has the details ;-)

See above: "git *log* -p `git notes get-ref`" :-) and with the
additional -S earch you can filter that log output to only contain the
wanted ones.

git log -p -S"win32 working build" `git notes get-ref`

gives you only the annotation commits, and contains the annotated revision

I didn't just suggest things by only reading the manpage, I also
played with it....

ciao
Christian