Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 09:16 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:

In general, and if the expression's value is not used, prefix 
increment/decrement is preferable to postfix, as the former conceptually 
avoids creation of a temporary that makes the old, unmodified value 
available as the expression's value.

Just to be picky, if my memory of C++ serves, ...

(*) For built-in types, it is true that prefix and postfix
    increment/decrement have the same effect on the variable.

(*) For STL iterators, I guess that the same statement is true.  At
    least, I think that a violation of the symmetry would have
    provoked my "Oh, eeeuuuw!" reflex so strongly that I would
    remember it.  <grin />

(*) For class types in general, the prefix and postfix operators can
    be completely different.  In my opinion, it is evil to do this;
    but the language allows it.

Terry.


That said, you see both forms with more-or-less similar frequency in the 
wild.

-Stephan



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.