On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 19:46 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote:
http://www.antelink.com/blog/libreoffice-vs-openoffice-anatomical-study-fork.html
Indeed ! it seems reasonable; their initial graph falls foul of the
emacs / vi header / footer addition / removals which skew the commit
statistics (and I try to filter out of the numbers where possible ).
Their 'code snippet' based tools are much more useful & interesting.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.