Would it not be possible to add specific with/without switches for
features that require 3rd party libs?
We already have too much configurability.
Remember, each new binary enable/disable or with/without switch we add
doubles the number of combinations that we should test. Yeah, dream
on, we all know that we won't be doing that, so each new binary option
is then a potential problem when somebody in the future decides to use
a combination nobody else has tried.
so users could choose which features they
really want in during the compile, making the build smaller if they
want to.
"users" ? You must have a different definition of "user" than I have.
Is our target market (= "users") really people who don't plan to do
any code fixes or additions, but do want to be able to boast how they
have built their own LibreOffice a bit more lightweight than that from
their distro!
i can quite
ensure you that I am capable of running tests for on/off for each
swich weekly.
And for each platform, and for a representative selection of distros
in the Linux case?
--tml
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.