On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 12:21 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
and it seems unclear what the benefit vs. the pain pwrt.
when re-synching (around deleting old remote branches etc.) would be.
Given enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow. Having commits visible
some time before they hit master might prevent some needless
inconvenience.
The question is - where to get the eyeballs from ;-) Sadly, there is
not an infinite supply, do people review branches routinely ? (how about
if there were 60+ of them all short lived?).
Still - if you're interested in reviewing branches, I'd be eager to get
your feedback on feature/gtk3 - pwrt. whether it is safe to include (ie.
won't break the gtk2 frontend too badld) ;-) I want to merge that before
the conference ideally ...
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror · Caolán McNamara
Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror · Bjoern Michaelsen
Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror · Stephan Bergmann
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.