Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:20:32 +0200
Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
wrote:

What good is that backport to 3.4?

Well, it is a clearcut regression (the error was introduced between
3.3 and 3.4) and a good fix (even breaking on link is better than
breaking at runtime) -- so I automatically backported after review.
Other than the "needs one signoff"-rule, we have little guidelines on
what goes on the release branch. Maybe we should be a little more
strict. But I guess still no revert needed?

Best,

Bjoern

-- 
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.